Denominative variation around the concept of forensic speech comparison

Authors

Keywords:

term variation, denominative variation, forensic linguistics, forensic speech comparison

Abstract

This article examines the terminological variation in the forensic speech comparison test within the field of forensic linguistics, utilizing a specialized corpus of approximately 300 court rulings. The primary aim of this study is to analyze the formal structure and distribution of denominative variants associated with this concept within a jurisprudential context.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

García Antuña, M. (2024). Denominative variation around the concept of forensic speech comparison. Terminàlia, 2(30), 28–39. Retrieved from https://revistes.iec.cat/index.php/Terminalia/article/view/154424

Issue

No. 30: december

Section

Articles

License

Authors registered on the OJS platform must read the copyright assignment terms and fill in the corresponding acceptance box.

The intellectual property of articles belongs to the respective authors.

On submitting articles for publication to the journal Terminàlia, authors accept the following terms:

  1. Authors assign to SCATERM (a subsidiary of Institut d'Estudis Catalans) the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and distribution of the articles submitted for publication to Terminàlia.
  2. Authors answer to SCATERM for the authorship and originality of submitted articles.
  3. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for the reproduction of all graphic material included in articles.
  4. SCATERM declines all liability for the possible infringement of intellectual property rights by authors.
  5. The contents published in the journal, unless otherwise stated in the text or in the graphic material, are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (by-nc-nd) 3.0 Spain licence, the complete text of which may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.en. Consequently, the general public is authorised to reproduce, distribute and communicate the work, provided that its authorship and the body publishing it are acknowledged, and that no commercial use and no derivative works are made of it.
  6. The journal is not responsible for the ideas and opinions expressed by the authors of the published articles.