Two modes of thinking in knowledge building Authors Marlene Scardamalia Institute for Knowledge Innovation & Technology, OISE / Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. University of Toronto. Carl Bereiter Institute for Knowledge Innovation & Technology, University of Toronto, OISE. Keywords: Knowledge building, critical thinking, design thinking, innovation, community knowledge, improving ideas. Abstract In productive work with knowledge and ideas, two kinds of thinking play vital roles: critical thinking and design thinking. Critical thinking has dominated education, from Socratic dialogues of ancient times to modern argumentation frameworks, software, and 21st century skill lists, curriculum guidelines, and achievements tests. Design thinking, in contrast, has entered educational discourse much later and from outside– from contexts where creative work with knowledge and ideas is dominant. As education for innovation becomes an imperative, design thinking has begun to gain attention but has yet to become integrated into the mainstream of work with educational content. Knowledge building operates in design mode. In this mode, design thinking plays the leading role in knowledge creation and idea improvement,while critical thinking plays important supportive roles. Shifting flexibly between the two kinds of thinking is essential. To support knowledge building teachers need to establish a community that provides mutual support for knowledge building discourse and that maintains a norm of collective responsibility for idea improvement. Both critical thinking and design thinking take many years to develop to a high level, but children can begin functioning in design mode from an early age and thereby gain competence in both kinds of thinking and learn to use them together in advancing community knowledge. In the largest sense, this is socialization into life and work in a knowledge society.Keywords: Knowledge building, critical thinking, design thinking, innovation, community knowledge, improving ideas. Downloads Download data is not yet available. Author Biographies Marlene Scardamalia, Institute for Knowledge Innovation & Technology, OISE / Ontario Institute for Studies in Education. University of Toronto. Carl Bereiter, Institute for Knowledge Innovation & Technology, University of Toronto, OISE. Downloads PDF (Català) How to Cite Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2017). Two modes of thinking in knowledge building. Revista Catalana De Pedagogia, 12, 61–83. Retrieved from https://revistes.iec.cat/index.php/RCP/article/view/143999 More Citation Formats ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver Download Citation Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX Issue Vol. 12 (2017) Section Monographic issue. Practice, theory and evaluation of innovation License The intellectual property of articles belongs to the respective authors. On submitting articles for publication to the journal Revista Catalana de Pedagogia, authors accept the following terms: Authors grant to Societat Catalana de Pedagogia (a subsidiary of Institut d’Estudis Catalans) the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and distribution of the articles submitted for publication to Revista Catalana de Pedagogia. Authors answer to Societat Catalana de Pedagogia for the authorship and originality of submitted articles. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for the reproduction of all graphic material included in articles. Societat Catalana de Pedagogia declines all liability for the possible infringement of intellectual property rights by authors. The contents published in the journal, unless otherwise stated in the text or in the graphic material, are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (by-nc-nd) 3.0 Spain licence, the complete text of which may be found at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.en. Consequently, the general public is authorised to reproduce, distribute and communicate the work, provided that its authorship and the body publishing it are acknowledged, and that no commercial use and no derivative works are made of it. The journal is not responsible for the ideas and opinions expressed by the authors of the published articles.