«Romania», «Romanitas», «Romanistica»

Authors

  • Antoni M. Badia i Margarit

Abstract

On resuming the publication of ER I examine the meaning of a (new) journal of Romance philology at the present time, when there is no lack of voices auguring a decline in this field. Does Romance philology still have a reason for being today? Latin became fragmented, giving shape to the Romance tongues which came in time to ac-quire a rank previously reserved to that language. The Renaissance encouraged the equation ?one country = one language? to the detriment of the languages lacking their own state. Romance philology arose in the 19th century and by the middle of the 20th it reached a high scientific level that involved, in many cases, a clear component of humanism. At the present time Romance philology coexists with other methods and is enriched by its contact with them. If research into particular Romance languages has been gaining prevalence, this does not mean that research on the ensemble of Romance languages must disappear. To the contrary, vast perspectives are opening today to Romance philology thanks to the proliferation of methods and to pluridisciplinarity.

Published

2001-06-08

Issue

Section

Articles