Once the article has been considered suitable for publication it will be sent to be evaluated by two expert reviewers, external or from the Scientific Council, in a confidential and anonymous (double-blind) way.
The reviewers will indicate: whether it has the scientific category required; if the contributions are of interest and original; if it is presented with scientific rigor and in the right format. In the case of different judgements between the two reviewers the work will be sent to a third evaluator.
The selection of the reviewers is the responsibility of the journal's editors who take into account their academic, scientific and professional expertise. It includes specialists from both national and international sources. Reviewers may occasionally be members of the Scientific Council.
The journal’s Editorial Board reserves the right based on external reports to accept or reject articles. The factors on which the acceptance or refusal decision is based (on the part of the publishers of the journal) are the following: 1) originality: full original text, valuable information, repetition of known results; 2) current and novel; 3) relevance: applicability of results for the resolution of specific problems; 4) significant for the advancement of scientific knowledge; 5) reliable and scientifically valid: proven methodological quality; 6) presentation: well written, organized (logical coherence and material presentation). f) Publication process.
Once the evaluation process has been completed the principal author will be notified of the work’s acceptance or rejection.
