El Magnificat BWV 243 de Johann Sebastian Bach i el Magnificat HARWV 43 de Gottlob Harrer: dues propostes compositives Authors Jordi Rifé i Santaló Abstract The second version of Bach's Magnificat was presumably performed in Dresden in July 1733 and in this paper it is conjectured that Harrer's Magnificat was interpreted in Warsaw in 1734, both in court liturgical ceremonies. This temporary and territorial proximity serves as the basis for establishing the comparison between the two works. It may benoted, moreover, that Harrer succeeded Bach as the head of the Thomaskirche in Leipzig in 1750. Comparison is used as a method, analyzing sound, formal aspects and the music-text relationship of the Magnificats. Likewise, we show the difference in the proportions of the works, finding a greater wealth and more versatile timbre in Bach than in Harrer. This paper also discusses how tradition and innovation were coordinated at a time of aesthetic change and simultaneity of styles the Baroque and the Galant. Lastly, we conclude that the treatment of the two Magnificats is very different. The innovations of Bach are made patent with respect to Harrer, who is more closely linked to the Baroque tradition of polychorality. Downloads Text complet (Català) Published 2021-01-18 Issue Vol. 13 (2020) Section Articles License The intellectual property of the articles belongs to the respective authors. At the time of submitting the articles to Revista Catalana de Musicologia, authors accept the following terms: — Authors assign to the Societat Catalana de Musicologia (a subsidiary of the Institut d’Estudis Catalans) the rights of reproduction, public communication (including communication through social networks) and distribution of the articles submitted for publication to Revista Catalana de Musicologia, in any form and medium, including digital platforms. The Publications Committee reserves the right to accept or refuse submitted articles and the right to make any editorial changes it deems appropriate. If the suggested changes are accepted by authors, they should re-submit the article with such changes. — Authors answer to the Societat Catalana de Musicologia for the authorship and originality of submitted articles. In other words, authors assure that submitted articles do not contain fragments of works by other authors or fragments of their own previously published works; that the content of articles is original, and that the copyright of third parties is not infringed upon. Authors accept this responsibility and undertake to hold harmless the Societat Catalana de Musicologia for any loss or damage resulting from non-compliance with this obligation. Furthermore, they should include a statement in articles submitted to the journal regarding their responsibility for the content of the articles. — Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for the reproduction of all graphic material included in articles, and they should moreover ensure that images, videos, etc., have been created with the consent of the individuals appearing in them, and that material belonging to third parties is clearly identified and acknowledged as such within the text. Likewise, authors should provide the respective consents and authorisations to the Societat Catalana de Musicologia when submitting articles. — The Societat Catalana de Musicologia is exempt from any liability arising from the possible infringement of intellectual property rights by authors. In all cases, it undertakes to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions and apologies, if necessary. — Unless otherwise stated in the text or in the graphic material, the contents published in the journal are subject to an Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivs 3.0 Spain (by-nc-nd) license from Creative Commons, the full text of which may be consulted at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.en. Therefore, the general public is authorised to reproduce, distribute and communicate articles as long as their authorship and publishing entity are acknowledged, and no commercial use is made of them nor derivative work produced from them. — The journal is not responsible for the ideas and opinions expressed by the authors of published articles.
