The democratic principle and constitutional justification of the right to decide (DOI: 10.2436/20.3000.02.20)

Autors/ores

  • Josep Maria Vilajosana Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF)

Paraules clau:

Right to decide, evolutive interpretation, liberal democracy, personal autonomy, inviolability, human dignity, dominion of the majorities

Resum

In this article, the author defends the right to decide, meaning that holding a referendum on the political future of Catalonia is not banned by the Spanish Constitution (SC). The principal reason cited is that the principle of indissolubility (section 2.1 of the SC) and the principle of national sovereignty (section 1.2 of the SC) should be adequately balanced with the principles of liberal democracy (as defined in sections 1.1, 23.1, 9 and 10 of the SC). In light of this perspective, the article provides justification for two main aspects: 1) holding a referendum on Catalonia's independence on the grounds of an evolutive interpretation of democratic rights linked to a dense conception of democracy; and 2) holding a referendum exclusively in Catalonia, in order to avoid shifting from the principle of the majority to the dominion of the majorities.

Key words: right to decide, evolutive interpretation, liberal democracy, personal autonomy, inviolability, human dignity, dominion of the majorities

Original source: Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals, 19: 178-210 (2014)

Descàrregues

Les dades de descàrrega encara no estan disponibles.

Descàrregues

Número

Núm. 4 (2014)

Secció

Dret

Llicència

The intellectual property of articles belongs to the respective authors.
On publishing articles to the journal Catalan Social Sciences Review (CSSR), authors accept the following terms:
  1. Authors assign to Philosophy and Social Sciences Section (a subsidiary of Institut d’Estudis Catalans) the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and distribution of the articles published in Catalan Social Sciences Review (CSSR).
  2. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for the reproduction of all graphic material included in articles.
  3. Philosophy and Social Sciences Section declines all liability for the possible infringement of intellectual property rights by authors.
  4. The contents published in the journal, unless otherwise stated in the text or in the graphic material, are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (by-nc-nd) 3.0 Spain licence, the complete text of which may be found at  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.en. Consequently, the general public is authorised to reproduce, distribute and communicate the work, provided that its authorship and the body publishing it are acknowledged, and that no commercial use and no derivative works are made of it.
  5. Catalan Social Sciences Review (CSSR)  is not responsible for the ideas and opinions expressed by the  authors of the published articles.