Philosophy of History as theodicy (DOI: 10.2436/20.3000.02.25)

Autors/ores

  • Gabriel Amengual Coll Universitat de les Illes Balears (UIB)

Paraules clau:

Hegel, Philosophy of History, theodicy

Resum

Taking Adorno's critique of Hegel's Philosophy of History as point of departure, this paper: (1) sketches the general outlines of the modern Philosophy of History in order to (2) spotlight their commonalities and differences. Hegel's Philosophy of History (3) can be described by considering pain and the negative. It highlights these topics in a way that had never been done before, so it became a turning point, as revealed by the fact that he treated the Philosophy of History as theodicy. Despite his initial intention of carrying out theodicy, which Leibniz depicted in a metaphysical and abstract way, in the specific field of history, this intention was realised not in the Philosophy of History (it only conceptualises theodicy as viewed as a framework of meaning for action) but instead in the absolute spirit, in his reference to Christianity and specifically to incarnation and Christ's death.

Key words: Hegel, Philosophy of History, theodicy

Original source: Anuari de la Societat Catalana de Filosofia, 22: 27-52 (2011)

Descàrregues

Les dades de descàrrega encara no estan disponibles.

Descàrregues

Publicat

2015-11-22

Número

Núm. 5 (2015)

Secció

Filosofia

Llicència

The intellectual property of articles belongs to the respective authors.
On publishing articles to the journal Catalan Social Sciences Review (CSSR), authors accept the following terms:
  1. Authors assign to Philosophy and Social Sciences Section (a subsidiary of Institut d’Estudis Catalans) the rights of reproduction, communication to the public and distribution of the articles published in Catalan Social Sciences Review (CSSR).
  2. Authors are responsible for obtaining permission for the reproduction of all graphic material included in articles.
  3. Philosophy and Social Sciences Section declines all liability for the possible infringement of intellectual property rights by authors.
  4. The contents published in the journal, unless otherwise stated in the text or in the graphic material, are subject to a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (by-nc-nd) 3.0 Spain licence, the complete text of which may be found at  http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/deed.en. Consequently, the general public is authorised to reproduce, distribute and communicate the work, provided that its authorship and the body publishing it are acknowledged, and that no commercial use and no derivative works are made of it.
  5. Catalan Social Sciences Review (CSSR)  is not responsible for the ideas and opinions expressed by the  authors of the published articles.